Talk:Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article reads like a PR piece for the MIMA institute, and does not take into account the criticism of the MIMA project by local news outlets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.4.28 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Reply:) Erm, well as the author of much of the piece, I'm not sure I especially agree... I wasn't aware of that much criticism of the gallery itself outside of the select opinions of certain writers to the Evening Gazette letters pages, and that of Craig Hornby and his fears that it could turn into the next Stockton Arc - a "giant white spaceship" or something to that effect. Clearly, if I've been researching thoroughly in one direction, then I certainly mustn't have been in another. Oh, and I am, by the way, unconnected to the gallery except to say that I am a local, Middlesbrough-born Fine Art student who obviously by virtue of that naturally has direct and regular access to the gallery.

Still, I admit that there's much personal research here, containing certain claims for which references to original material will certainly be needed (Arthur Dorman's initial 1904 plans, say). I'm happy to tend to that in due course. MRacer 12:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires infobox
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Investigate red-links to see of articles exist under different names or capitalisation

Keith D 14:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:05, 27 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001125205/http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2190086.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2190086.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]