Talk:Microturbo TRI 60
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Microturbo TRI 60. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090110071943/http://www.ndu.edu/inss/books/books_2002/Globalization_and_Maritime_Power_Dec_02/27_ch26.htm to http://www.ndu.edu/inss/books/books_2002/Globalization_and_Maritime_Power_Dec_02/27_ch26.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617102346/http://ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/international/inter-73.cfm?&CFID=594 to http://ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/international/inter-73.cfm?&CFID=594
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Specifications - thrust specific fuel consumption.
[edit]A slight headache here.
The article stated: 1.1 kg/(daN h) (1.03 lb/(lbf h)).
But that is by definition incorrect because:
- 1.1 kg/(daN⋅h) works out as 30.56 g/(kN s), which converts to 1.079 lb/(lbf⋅h)
- 1.03 lb/(lbf⋅h) converts to 29 g/(kN⋅s)
Given the French origin of this design, I'll assume 1.1 kg/(daN⋅h) is from the source. The convert template doesn't know about kg/(daN⋅h). So I'll go with 30.6 g/(kN⋅s) - it's 30.56 g/(kN⋅s) to 4SF.
This could very well be very wrong.