Talk:Microsuction tape

Hello Ajgorhoe -- Microsuction does not appear in available dictionaries. Micro-suction was a registered trademark found in uspto.gov.[1] A simple Google search will find you Sewell microsuction tape. It doesn't much matter why your write an article. If you talk about a single product, the article will be called promotion, or you'll be called a fanboy. Rhadow (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from your talk page) Thanks for your answers. I didn't find the registered trademark info. Can you provide a link (maybe we'd better move this discussion to article's talk page so it helps future contributors)? I'm still trying to disentangle arguments stated in deletion tag. Article has nothing to do with commercial promotion. My intention was to describe the concept (like in Screw, for example), not a particular product of a particular company. Short information on related applications, products, producers, tratemarks, etc., would be helpful, and I thing it would be very good for the article if you add it, as it seems you have some overview (my interest and knowledge here are more in technical aspects). --Ajgorhoe (talk) 01:34, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't open the uspto link. There are probably more producers (Forbes mentions Exel Trading), information on that can be added to the article but I don't see it as priority. I think there is a slight misunderstanding here. I'm not talking about a single product. I'm talking about a concept (a tool, device, whatever you want to call it). --Ajgorhoe (talk) 01:49, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Yet another product of this class might be this one, though it's not clear to me whether it's about the same concept. --Ajgorhoe (talk) 02:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rhadow, I've noticed that you deleted description of mechanism behind the concept in the same edit where you inserted the proposed deletion template. Contents of the article can be misinterpreted due to lack of information. I've added the contents back.