Talk:Microsoft mobile services

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Microsoft: Windows Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Microsoft Windows (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Microsoft Mobile was copied or moved into Microsoft Mobile Services with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

¿Is this article really necessary? (maybe some sort of split or make it a collection/list of mobile services)

As far as I can tell there are several full articles about Microsoft's mobile services, maybe this article isn't what it needs to be, maybe it should become some sort of list with links to them, now it has half-duplicate material, and half outdated collections, I think that it would be better if we'd include more links to Microsoft's other mobile services through re-organizing this article into a list like what happens when you type in "Google Mobile" for example. Sincerely, --Namlong618 (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As by viewing this page's history at the time of this comment this entire page was merely a leftover of a reverted merger with the Bing Mobile and MSN Mobile pages and contained duplicate information and was a "start-class" article with no sources, since then this page has greatly been expanded, and unsourced material has either been removed or referenced, this user's question is now (July 2015) obsolete and doesn't reflect the current scope of the article. --42.113.73.178 (talk) 05:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imaging apps in introduction

IN Microsoft Mobile's services section the reference to the Lumia imaging apps is introductory, the sub-section exists to give more details. --Lumia930uploader (talk) 09:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two question..

Should we arrange this list alphabetically.

Should other services broken down into sub sections based on... any idea???

JosephBorglio (talk) 12:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content and no justification of it

Several users have removed content, the first one claiming a criteria but quotes no actual wiki policy and the second one simply stating it as "irrelevant" despite coming from the same section of the page where the rest of the more recent content was moved from, before removing it again I suggest for these editors to go to the talk page before removing entire sections again, as far as I can see it's relevant to include discontinued services as this has always been the case on Wikipedia, and as per WP:NOTABILITY if it was once notable, it'll always be notable, and nowhere does it say that this is exclusively a list of current Microsoft Mobile Services. --42.113.73.231 (talk) 00:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming the Microsoft Mobile section as Lumia won't be better categorization as most of these other services are either directly linked with (Dvlup, software updater), or applications available for Lumia (Microsoft Math, Data Gathering and others), so the present organization fits, and so far all these services have in common is that they were developed by the former Nokia division which compromises a lot more than just "Lumia". --42.113.73.231 (talk) 00:44, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Other services" is a bad idea

The present line out includes product divisions, though some parts may be outdated (e.g. Windows Live, Skype Wi-Fi which is set to be renamed Microsoft Wi-Fi), the former Nokia services share the fact that they were made by what used to be Nokia's devices and services employees, video games contains this differentiation to exclude Microsoft Studios' games. Anyhow I just want to show my objections towards reorganizing it in any way that would make this less clear to readers. --42.113.73.231 (talk) 02:52, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great article but does it includes all the services of Microsoft since 1985. Can anyone help

This is a great article but does it includes all the services of Microsoft since 1985. Can anyone help 144.36.230.76 (talk) 05:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a list type article and requires expansion, anyone can help as Wikipedia is free to edit, I think that by the definition of "Mobile Services" the original author of the page probably meant on mobile devices such as PDAs, smartphones, and feature phones as opposed to laptops, notebooks, netbooks, etcetera, on which Microsoft has only been active since 2001, and this list contains less than half of these services. --42.113.73.231 (talk) 06:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Microsoft Categories

Recently @Ocexyz: removed several categories under the guise of "Removed false categories in context of this article added for commercial or advertising purposes, removed advertising, removed falsification." I will here debunk this and will write why each individual category is completely relevant in the context of this article.

Category:Android (operating system) software these are services available for the Android plaform:

Microsoft Office Lens
Microsoft Outlook Mobile
Microsoft OneDrive Mobile
Microsoft Office Mobile
MSN News
MSN Money
MSN Sports
MSN Weather
MSN Food & Drink
MSN Health & Fitness
Bing
Cortana (announced)
Skype
Skype Wi-Fi
GroupMe
Skype Qik
Groove Music
Xbox LIVE
Remote Desktop
Xbox 360 SmartGlass
Xbox One SmartGlass

Category:IOS software These are services available for iPods, iPhones, and iPads:

Microsoft Outlook Mobile
Microsoft OneDrive Mobile
Microsoft Office Mobile
MSN News
MSN Money
MSN Sports
MSN Weather
MSN Food & Drink
MSN Health & Fitness
Bing
Cortana (announced)
Skype
GroupMe
Skype Qik
Photosynth
Groove Music
Xbox LIVE
Remote Desktop
Xbox 360 SmartGlass
Xbox One SmartGlass

Category:Nokia services These are services originally created by Nokia or corporation/company that was acquired by Nokia and eventually added to Microsoft Mobile Oy:

DVLUP
Lumia Beta Apps
Lumia Conversations
Lumia Imaging apps (Lumia Panorama, Lumia Camera, Etc.)
Microsoft Data Gathering
Microsoft Education Delivery
Microsoft Math
Microsoft Mobile Devices Community
Lumia Software Recovery Tool
Windows Phone Recovery Tool
JobLens
InternshipsLens
Boston University JobLens
Nokia Store
MixRadio
Nokia Mail
Nokia Chat
Motion Data

Category:Symbian software:

Nokia MoMaths (Microsoft Math)
Nokia Panorama (here as Lumia Panorama)
Lumia Software Recovery Tool (actually supports Symbian)
Microsoft Office Mobile
Windows Live Messenger Mobile
Hotmail Mobile

Category:MeeGo software:

Nokia Panorama
Lumia Software Recovery Tool (actually supports the Nokia N9)
Windows Live Messenger Mobile
Hotmail Mobile

And I'm sure that I've missed several applications, but still each category is here for a reason and none of it is either falsification nor advertisement, and if you think that this is unique to this article please go to Spotify which is also listed among Android, iOS, and Symbian software unlike Apple Microsoft does not make software exclusively for its own platform, and in fact Symbian and MeeGo are Microsoft platforms now so removing those categories is even more falsification on your own part.

Before you revert my reversion of your edit please read this and then look at the content, each and every category is referenced and described in the article itself, falsification would be adding desktop OS-related categories (as this article only describes mobile applications). --Hoang the Hoangest (talk) 08:56, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I'm getting sick of Nokia and Linux fanboys mass deleting content from Microsoft-related pages for no other reason than the fact that they hate Microsoft and want to remove any reference of Nokia, Symbian, MeeGo and other things in the mere history of these services, for the past year Nokia fanboys have constantly been removing Nokia and Microsoft history for reason no other than the claim that people who want to write Microsoft-related articles to actually match Wikipedia's standards are "employees of Microsoft", so far I've reverted almost all of these deletionists and it's great to see that so far a lot of Nokia fanboys have grown to defend the content and the encyclopedial integrity of these Nokia & Microsoft-related articles, but the moment people start calling facts as "advertisement" and "falsification" I'm going to take this personally, of course the larger deletion has calmed down over the last few months and almost all Nokia+Microsoft articles are largely free of these anti-Microsoft trolls, the problem is that they're on almost every language of Wikipedia, I've reverted them on German, Spanish, Dutch, French, and many other versions of Wikipedia, Microsoft bought Nokia's devices and services business and got almost all patents related to design and trademarks of Asha, Symbian, numbered, Mobira, SXX, MeeGo, Maemo, and other devices, deal with it, and if Microsoft got these services too they deserve to be mentioned on a page that discusses the services Microsoft supports that originally ran on Symbian and MeeGo this is not falsification in any way, nor is this an advertisement, what use would it be to advertise to a defunct operating system like MeeGo that literally no one of any importance cares about? Why would people want to advertise Microsoft services on Symbian which yes, may have been the Android of the 2000"s but is now effectively defunct and is maintained by Accenture, Microsoft Mobile Oy, and Avanade until only 2016 with absolutely no new models coming out? to call these categories "advertisements" is blatantly wrong, over the past month I've successfully fended off these attacks on Microsoft articles and the sole attack left is this one, these services belong there, and the categories belong here, let me list more Symbian and MeeGo software mentioned in this article.

Symbian:

Skype
Nokia Mail
Nokia Chat
Nokia Store
Nokia Data Gathering (Microsoft Data Gathering)
Nokia Education Delivery (Microsoft Education Delivery)

MeeGo:

Skype
Nokia Mail
Nokia Chat
Nokia Store
Nokia Data Gathering (Microsoft Data Gathering)
Nokia Education Delivery (Microsoft Education Delivery)

And I'm still sure that I've missed a few here, please do not remove these categories again.

--Hoang the Hoangest (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and agree with your message but please for the sake of civility follow assume good faith of others, to me it seems as if both parties were focused more on their emotions than staying civil. --58.187.228.171 (talk) 01:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Skype for Business Mobile

Should Skype for Business and by extend Lync be mentioned in the Skype or in the Office section? I can see how Microsoft still advertises it as a part of Microsoft Office but it has the Skype branding thus it's thereby effectively a part of Skype. --58.187.165.40 (talk) 00:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Stream

The Microsoft Stream article should be developed. Isn't that a rebranding of Microsoft Office 365 Video? If so, both that article and this article's section on Microsoft Office 365 Video should be updated. MaynardClark (talk) 19:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Microsoft mobile services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]