Jump to content

Talk:Microplastics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Definition

[edit]

The definition of microplastics, less than 5 mm dia, is illogical, considering all polymers leaving Polymerisation Factories are small beads that fall into this category. Most are 2- 3 mm dia by 4mm long,prior to processing. This definition condemns all Polymers to the "fear" of microplastics ingestion, when in fact the problem is a waste management issue that has been around for centuries.The world wide practice of dumping rubbish in the Ocean rivers creeks has now been exposed because a large percentage of plastics float, unlike steel cans and glass bottles that sink. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.82.147.188 (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Intro to Policy Analysis Critique

[edit]

A. Most of the facts have reliable sources but some of the facts come from sites that could be interpreted as biased or unreliable.

C. The article remains neutral because it seems that its main focus is to educate readers on the nature of microplastics as well as where it comes from.

G. A lot of the information is recent so not much needs to be updated, however, there are some sources from the 20th century and would most likely need to be updated. Due to the nature of the plastic pollution, it is important that the resources remain updated so I would try to keep the cited works as recent as possible.

Chloeurofsky (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decomposition

[edit]

Mushrooms: Carbios, Biohm[1], Pestalotiopsis microspora [2]

Bacteria: Pseudomonas morganensis, Ideonella sakaiensis

Enzymes: [3],[4], [5], [6] , [7],[8],[9],[10], [11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19], [20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27]

Insects: Zophobas morio [28], Mealworms [29], Galleria mellonella [30], Plodia Interpunctella [31]

Algae: [32], [33], Phaeodactylum tricornutum [34]

194.246.144.13 (talk) 17:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

194.246.144.13 This is teh microplastics page, not the plastic decomposition page. Microplastics are not mentioned in the first two articles I checked.Wuerzele (talk) 12:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Instead, citation [64] applys to the contents intended by [63]. And "Considering that one treatment plant discharges 160 trillion liters of water per day, around 8 trillion microbeads are released into waterways every day", the numbers in bold are related to the United States as a country, not one treatment plant. ThomasYehYeh (talk) 10:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found the same mistake. I don’t understand the calculations of the referenced text, but I removed the incorrect citation and the obviously wrong “160 trillion liters per plant and day”. 37.138.102.85 (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Microplastic particles in human body

[edit]

The #Human body section (permalink) collects a bunch of unrelated papers reporting random findings of microplastic particles. Such statements have clear (non-necessarily intentional) scaremonger effects on the reader, while there is no general consensus neither about how microplastics are widespread in the human body or in average human food, nor about how dangerous this presence would be. Horcrux (talk) 10:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The #Humans section has a statement about the lack of consensus. Makes me wonder why the two sections are in completely different parts of the article. HansVonStuttgart (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Correct. @HansVonStuttgart Its because the entire article has no guardian editors-, someone or a bunch that seem to have an overview about environmental health...Its written rather lay language wise ("where microplastics can be found" = repository), exposure pathways are missing, the rest of biology is missing, anthropocentric as usual. the same is true for the lede, which is stuffed with hodgepodge details (even geologist student Björn Lycke was allowed to sneak his paper in, arrgh!) loaded with refs and will need to be rewritten to summarize the body. Wuerzele (talk) 08:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following recent review articles may be used to improve the health aspects in this article:

  • Feng, Yudong; Tu, Chen; Li, Ruijie; Wu, Di; Yang, Jie; Xia, Yankai; Peijnenburg, Willie J.G.M.; Luo, Yongming (2023). "A systematic review of the impacts of exposure to micro- and nano-plastics on human tissue accumulation and health". Eco-Environment & Health (Review). 2 (4): 195–207. doi:10.1016/j.eehl.2023.08.002.
  • Zuri, Giuseppina; Karanasiou, Angeliki; Lacorte, Sílvia (2023). "Human biomonitoring of microplastics and health implications: A review". Environmental Research (Review). 237: 116966. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.116966.
  • Barceló, Damià; Picó, Yolanda; Alfarhan, Ahmed H. (2023). "Microplastics: Detection in human samples, cell line studies, and health impacts". Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology (Review). 101: 104204. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2023.104204.
  • Li, Yue; Tao, Le; Wang, Qiong; Wang, Fengbang; Li, Gang; Song, Maoyong (2023). "Potential Health Impact of Microplastics: A Review of Environmental Distribution, Human Exposure, and Toxic Effects". Environment & Health (Review). 1 (4): 249–257. doi:10.1021/envhealth.3c00052.

--Leyo 13:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Bio48L

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): OAovon4 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by OAovon4 (talk) 02:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]