Jump to content

Talk:Micro-inequity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyvio

[edit]

The first paragraph of this article is a near-verbatim copy of the third paragraph of an article in DiversityInc magazine. If you are familiar with microinequities, please rewrite the first paragraph of this article. Instance 02:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

[edit]

I think the "samizdat papers" needs defining in the text in this context. 129.11.186.208 (talk) 23:31, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think "samizdat" violates neutrality principles in this context.VaneWimsey (talk) 01:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Black and white thinking?

[edit]

The saying "black and white thinking" has absolutely nothing to do with race. It refers to extreme polarity on the outside ends of a scale. ie. "You don't think in shades of grey, just in black and white" meaning that one takes an extreme view (as if on an hue scale ranging from black to white) instead of being in the middle (grey, where the two hues combine.). This has absolutely nothing to do with skin color, nor is it saying that one is inherently better than the other. It just shows that the "black and white thinker" sees everything as an all or nothing proposition, without realizing that there could be shades of grey involved. Since there is no citations that reference this saying as being based on race, I will be removing it if there are no further objections.

184.78.162.36 (talk) 22:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Micro-inequity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Micro-inequity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be original research: "Various ideas are put forward regularly in an attempt to mitigate unconscious bias"

[edit]

The last section seems to be original research:

  • "Various ideas are put forward regularly in an attempt to mitigate unconscious bias."

Pete unseth (talk) 22:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India Education Program course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Title?

[edit]

Would "Micro-inequity Theory" be a better title. That seems to be what the article is about, not so much micro-inequities themselves. SnailsSpace (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Rudeness"

[edit]

For centuries, people spoke of others as being "rude" or "thoughtless". What does the concept of "micro-inequity" contribute to a deeper understanding of these ideas? Pete unseth (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like the expression "micro-inequity" is more focused on the effect on the listeners, more than on the character of the speaker or actor. I don't think any reasonable person would disagree that micro-inequities happen, whatever you want to call them. SnailsSpace (talk) 05:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]