Talk:Mick Ranger

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Sandline International

Was ranger part of Sandline International? This quote seems to imply so:

According to Peter Goslar, once a close friend of Riaan Stander, other board members of Bridge SA were Colonel Tim Spicer and Mick Ranger "of Sandline fame".
— Project Hammer

British Army Lt Col Tim Spicer was but I don't know about Ranger... -- Esemono 14:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello There,

I know this probably isn't the best place to post this and I have no intentions to disrespect Mr Ranger.

I have a UK registered company and deal in exporting cars.I am interested in starting up an Arms Brokering business and trying to gather some information and advice. Would anyone know where to start from.Do UK and Cyprus based companies have to apply for FFL? There seem to be a limited information on the net.

Hope someone will help.

Regards. Erkan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erkan85 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear sentence

"Ranger knew of the restrictions and told the reporter not use the word, "Iraq" in any paperwork."

I'm not sure how this sentence is meant to read. I wonder if there's supposed to be "he would" between "reporter" and "not." I'll remove the comma, but leave the clarification to someone else. tildetildetildetilde —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.36.119.188 (talk) 02:20:05, August 18, 2007 (UTC)

Very shoddy page

There was an unbelievable amount of POV and plain unsupported claims on this page, which I have done my best to tone down. In particular, the claim that "questionable dealings often end up violating United Nations embargoes" is not supported by the cited sources. The Syria deal was also misrepresented; a more objective reading of the cited source suggests Ranger wanted clear assurances that the weapons would not end up in Iraq. Nick Cooper 07:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Removed Military History Tag as article is out of scope. --dashiellx (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mick Ranger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001194200/http://www.imperialdefence.co.uk/ to http://www.imperialdefence.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mick Ranger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]