Talk:Mick Mulvaney/Archive 1

Archive 1

Multiple issues

This BLP article needs help from willing editors in the following department:

1. cleanup;
2. copyedit;
3. too essay-like, need more attention here by experts;
4. lead is too short, need more expert opinions here too;
5. refimprove for this BLP; &
6. wikify, which has been partially done to date.

Thoughts anyone? --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦№1185♪♫™} 21:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Mick Mulvaney

Why all the contentious comments? The article is factual and non-controversial. This is not an election forum for Mulvaney's election opponent, yet is being used as such. A candidate for U.S. Congress should have an article on Wikipedia. Mulvaney is currently running for U.S. Congress in a highly competitive election in South Carolina. A basic biographical sketch is necessary. Commentary from Spratt's supporters is not necessary. Teacherme (talk) 13:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

"Why all the contentious comments?"

Because a Mulvaney campaign staffer has been outed as the author.

http://www.wolfereports.com/2010/08/11/mulvaney-staffer-has-upset-the-wiki-gods/

"The article is factual and non-controversial."

It omits incidents like the Edenmoor bond scandal.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.74.8.3 (talk • contribs)

Mere candidates for office are not necessarily notable enough to have their own articles. Mulvaney should have an article because he is an incumbent state legislator, just like a member of the National Assembly of Burkina Faso or the State Great Khural of Mongolia. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Because his support of defunding meals on wheels for elderly and school food programs for poor people is vile. It sticks with his tea party assertions that people should take care of themselves. Yet, he went to college on a scholarship. Good thing people didn't think like him. I think Wikipedia needs to open up living persons bios to their inhumane actions like Mick Mulvaney, who says he is Catholic. His actions say he like any other Republican....out for monetary gain for himself, and not for people. He is a sick individual. And therefore his bio shouldn't even be public, but one for medical records, which are private things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6017:10E:F514:2218:34E2:57B5 (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Usual Game Playing

Here's a clue: if you write an article about a CANDIDATE you link it to the ELECTION article and vice versa. I checked the History log, and there are plenty of people on it who definitely know better than to do this kind of game-playing. Flatterworld (talk) 23:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Infobox Creation

I am having problems creating a multiple infobox for this page. Could somebody guide me through it on my page? Thanks! Brandon 21:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Townhalls removed

Will repost with actual video's of mulvaney as backup reference to section removed by orangemike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.144.123.209 (talk) 19:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mick Mulvaney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110727163210/http://www.palmettofamily.org/assets/2008legscorecard.pdf to http://www.palmettofamily.org/assets/2008legscorecard.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)