Talk:Michael de Angelo

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Cyr Myrddin, the Coming of Age of Merlin was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 20 February 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Michael de Angelo. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Speedy delete notes

Article's only reference 404s. ~~Article created by single-purpose editor Gododding Publishing, who is also the subject's publisher. Appears to be submitted for promotional purposes.~~ An author with 2 or 3 works is not de facto notable. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The works are notable, thus the author is and 404 errors aren't a reason for exclusion: webpages die all the time, but can offer sources at any point. I would suggest discussing this more generally at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyr Myrddin, the Coming of Age of Merlin with the intention of merging the works in the author page perhaps? Sadads (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The author might be notable, but there's no way a user (like myself) who is unfamiliar with the subject can discern that. That was the nature of my A7 speedy delete, i.e. no indication of the subject's importance exists in the article. So I think the speedy delete nom was legit. In consideration of the information you've provided, I could go either way on this. If you're interested beefing the article up at all that it answers questions about notability, I'll yield. But if you're not interested, I don't mind PROD-ing it with the hope that it will light a fire under someone's ass somewhere. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I created the article, not the single purpose editor. That is a misreading of the history on your part,Sadads (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't argue with that, I screwed up! I've striken my incorrect statements. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael de Angelo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711103941/http://www.gododdinpublishing.com/authors.html to http://www.gododdinpublishing.com/authors.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]