Talk:Michael Weeden
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Notability & POV issues
[edit]This article has Point of Views issues. It reads like a campaign brochure. The notability of the subject is questionable: the vast majority of NH state representatives do not have articles. Mr. Weeden is a fine fellow, but he is a rather obscure first-term member of the state legislature. A case could be made for creating articles about all 400 state reps, but the tone of those articles should be more encyclopedic than what we see here. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 21:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- Even though I was the person who added the Notability tag, I would vote to leave the article in place. It would inappropriate for me to edit the article itself because I know the subject. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 21:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)