Talk:Michael Thomas Sadler

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Sources etc

The recent revision of the article relies mainly on Hansard and the History of Parliament on-line for Sadler in Parliament (with the caveat that Hansard Millbank for whatever reason doesn't appear to cover 1829). Out of parliament, Seeley's biography of Sadler is semi-adulatory and horribly vague; Driver's biography of Oastler should shed some light on Sadler, but has its problems (for example, Oastler is encouraged to move from Methodism to CofE because Sadler is CofE, but 20 pages later we are told Sadler is a Methodist). That leaves any account heavily reliant on contemporary newspapers, most notably the Leeds Intelligencer written by partisans of Sadler (if not by Sadler himself), and the Leeds Mercury, whose editor was unremittingly hostile to Sadler and gave that hostility precedence over accuracy in reporting. Two points arise from that

the revision was not intended to be OR, but the choice of which items of news go into the article carries the risk of forcing upon events a spurious narrative thread. Hopefully the article has avoided that, but in the absence of supporting evidence in the contemporary newspapers it has not followed a narrative thread about the Leeds election of 1832 to be found in a number of accounts of the history of factory legislation or of the Ten-Hour Movement; that it was fought (and hard-fought) on the issue of factory reform between those who wanted reform and those who strongly opposed it.
the Leeds Mercury threw a lot of mud at Sadler in 1832, and repeated the exercise against Sir John Beckett, the Tory candidate in the 1834 by-election, but Beckett came within a whisker of winning the by-election. It would be nice to know (and OR to guess) why.Rjccumbria (talk) 22:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Thomas Sadler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070409070356/http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/home.htm to http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/home.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Thomas Sadler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]