Talk:Michael Schofield (American football)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 21:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This will be a quick fail for the following reasons that are collectively an undue amount of work to be expected within the GAN process:

Laughingly small lede (41 words) for a 781 word article
Four uncited sections for which I have now added tags
No less than six single line paragraphs
Most of the article reads like a diary of joining and leaving teams. No effort has been made to provide background or context for the moves, or generally for his career as a whole

This article is low effort and in poor shape. It is currently rated start-class and I think this is an accurate reflection of where it is at. The last time I can find you having actually edited this article is 2 May 2020‎. It is clear that you have not made any effort to check over this article or improve it prior to nominating it. You are a very experienced editor and I hope I am amply demonstrating my disappointment that you would believe this article is in any way ready for GAN (or even a B-class assessment). Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]