Talk:Michael S. Bernick
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I am curious as to why this page is considered an advertisement. According to the Wikipedia guidelines, there should be 1) no opinions presented (I don't think that there are on this page), 2) No contestable facts (seems like everything on the page is matter-of-fact), 3) No contestable assertions (again, I don't see bold statements of any kind), and 4) Nonjudgemental language (I don't see where there are any opinions, programs, people, etc. that are either praised or disparaged). Any explanation as to the reason for the advertising tag would be appreciated Rwyrwa (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- You've worked a lot on this page and it's not blatant advertising as far as I can see. I removed the tag and wish you happy editing. PS - could you move the image to the infobox? I would do it myself but I'm terrible at both images and infoboxes. Zakhalesh (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)