Talk:Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Original Research
[edit]In the controversies section, do we have a citation for the analysis of Blackmun's opinion? My personal opinion certainly concurs; there is a good chance he feels she encouraged Michael M. earlier so Michael M. shouldn't be charged with forcible rape; but that is just my personal opinion about how Blackmun felt and shouldn't be in wikipedia without a citation to a reliable source. What he said is that she encouraged him earlier so the prosecutors didn't think they could win a charge of forcible rape (yes, even here, I am reading into his description that such prosecution would be "unattractive") I am going to make an edit with this in mind. Please feel free to revert if a citation exists but please discuss here. --Bertrc (talk) 17:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Never mind. The existing cite note was simply in the wrong location. I have moved it. --Bertrc (talk) 13:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Massachusetts, Amherst supported by WikiProject Politics and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:48, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Q3