Talk:Michael Li
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Unsure what MRX is talking about. Article seems fine, although could use a few more citations.
- I recommend removing "like resume"
- I recommend removing "third-party", sources are 3rd party (e.g. newspapers) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blankshot (talk • contribs) 14:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
I agree with both. I am removing the first one now and will let another judge sources. Turnwreck (talk) 13:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Makes sense to me! Rinracy23 (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2017 (UTC)