Jump to content

Talk:Michael Lamb (psychologist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Lamb should not be removed from Wikipedia, since it is very notable person

[edit]
In 2004, he took a position as Professor and Head of the Department of Social and Developmental Psychology at Cambridge University in the United Kingdom, where He is now employed.
He has authored more than 630 publications that have appeared either in peer-reviewed professional journals or in professional books published by academic presses primarily for the readership of other professionals. He has written or edited about 40 books in the field of developmental psychology, development in infancy, mother-child relationships, father-child relationships, the role of the father, sibling relationships, the effects of nontraditional rearing circumstances, the effects of daycare, child abuse, and forensic interview practices. A number of his books, including my books on nontraditional families, are used widely as texts in graduate courses.
From 1987 until 2004, he was head of the Section on Social and Emotional Development and a Senior Research Psychologist at the United States’ National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, an institute within the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Last year he provided an affidavit to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and he contend in Perry v. Schwarzenegger#Psychological effects. He is an eminent expert in his research field and media covered these topics a lot with his name, for example: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-01-21-parentgender21_ST_N.htm or http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc2=news&sc3=&id=103651.
The article will be developed and extended shortly. --Destinero (talk) 07:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to article

[edit]

Hi there. I think the recent edits to Lamb's article - as in defending him - are really dramatic and unnecessary. While I understand the importance of having both "positive and negative" criticism, I think it's a bit much. I'd like to trim it up a bit, and ideally we need to find a resource that isn't the ACLU (since Lamb is an active member of that organization). Also, I'm going to remove the comment about scholarly reviews - all scholars have to review papers, and so forth, it's nothing new or unique to Lamb. SarahStierch (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Lamb (psychologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]