This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This section lacks sources. The original source used was the Daily Mail, now removed. I can't find any other sources that specifically link Michael Todd to the investigation. The probe into payoffs looked into the conduct of David Whatton who actually signed off the agreements; no evidence of criminal wrongdoing was found and the IPCC found no reason to investigate. If it should be mentioned in any article it should be that of Whatton, it isn't mentioned there and it shouldn't be here either. I propose deleting it unless anyone can find sources to back up its inclusion.
Further to the above, I've included a short section on the enquiry that took place after Todd's death, sourced to the BBC & MEN. The allegations originally contained within this article came from the Sunday Telegraph (repeated in the Daily Mail) and were retracted in 2013 following a successful libel case. [1] --DSQ (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
