Talk:Michael Hochberg

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Notability

Kung fu raccoon (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC) I decided to write a page about Michael Hochberg for several reasons. First, there has been extensive coverage of him in secondary sources, such as an article written about his nature materials result which was published in nature photonics, [1]. Both are very prestigious journals. Other examples include [2] and [3] and [4].[reply]

Another reason is his involvement in founding Luxtera, which along with Kotura is one of the two big silicon photonics companies. In my opinion, building photonics components in a silicon platform is an important step, but I’m not quite sure how to back that up- if you google silicon photonics though, you get a ton of stuff.

Finally his work with slot waveguide and electrooptic polymer waveguides has been widely cited – while his original article was published in 2005 [5] it has since been cited 53 times. That is a lot when you consider that “electrooptic effects in silicon”, an article that is considered by many (well, me anyway) to be one articles that really got the field started was written in 1987 has been cited 406 times.

Admittedly, I would not expect the wider public to know or care about him, but within the field of silicon photonics he is someone notable.

One thing which would make him notable would be an notable award [[6]] like the airfoce award might be enough but needs a citation. He is one of many researchers and as long nobody stated in a notable journal that Hochberg is exceptional in the area ao research the article is always on the brink of notability.

The one and only thing this artikle really needs is some links from other articles of Wikipedia. If Hochberg is notable there must be some place where is name comes up in the Wikipedia.

But for now it is OK.--Stone (talk) 21:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kung fu raccoon (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC) ok i added the air force ref[reply]

From the standard of above, it would seem to me that he is notable, especially with his recent winning of the PECASE, which is a very high prestige award given to a limited number of scientists each year. Within the silicon photonics community, he is widely known, though I suppose that is a very qualitative statement. I would ask what the standard for notability is, if what Hochberg has is not enough. There are high profile awards, high prestige publications, and participation in the founding of a company that is now a very big player in silicon photonics, and all of these are verified in secondary sources. Can dissenting editors please state the nature of the issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.55.195.242 (talk) 10:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Michael Hochberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]