Jump to content

Talk:Michael Clayton (soundtrack)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:MichaelClaytonSoundtrackArt.jpg

[edit]

Image:MichaelClaytonSoundtrackArt.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

I'm recommending this Stub article be merged with the Michael Clayton (film) article. I've already moved the pertinent copy over, and it presents no undue length issues there. Unless this article is going to see further development, it seems the topic can be adequately addressed in the (parent) film article.
Jim Dunning | talk 23:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Against--Beware the Unknown (talk) 03:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closing discussion as no debate has been generated in over two years.--Beware the Unknown (talk) 03:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]