Talk:Michael Baldasaro

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-04-11. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Cannabis Low‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Split

These two guys should certainly not be in the same article. Stifle (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. CJCurrie 21:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes and no, the true Canadian answer. 8^)

- My own opinion, as the original author and former resident of Hamilton where they are best known, is that they are fringe people worth little more than a stub collectively. Either man individually would not warrant an article, or if they got their own articles they would be criticised as a stub. Because they work in tandem, religiously and politically, you would effectively have to clone this article for no good purpose.

- However, if somebody feels like interviewing Brothers Wally and Michael, or poring over court documents to get more in-depth biographical details of arrests, charges and trials, and in the process really boosting the content, then yes, split.

Anderskin 22:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

OTOH, I'd have no problems merging it with the Church of the Universe. There is a role for the fringe, but by definition it is small. IIRC, I had planned to put the few biographical details there, but Baldassaro was already redlinked so I just wrote him a short little article.

Anderskin 22:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral?

In my opinion this article, both in its tone and the type of facts it chooses to present, prejudges both this individual and his organization. Regardless of the topic, neutrality is an important component in any Wikipedia article. thank you Deconstructhis (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reclassified as a start

This article has been reclassified as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 01:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Baldasaro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100820030102/http://www.hamilton.ca/CityDepartments/CorporateServices/Clerks/MunicipalElection/Nominated+Candidates.htm to http://www.hamilton.ca/CityDepartments/CorporateServices/Clerks/MunicipalElection/Nominated+Candidates.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Baldasaro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141109195218/http://vote2014.hamilton.ca/results/ to http://vote2014.hamilton.ca/results/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]