Talk:Metropolitan Library System (Oklahoma)

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Children's Books Section Edits

Record of discussion between Tspindle and Orenburg1;

Hi: I removed those lines about Steve Kern & Mick Cornett from the Metropolitan Library System (Oklahoma) entry simply because I don't think they contribute to the entry. My intentions weren't to dismiss these issues or to censor them but I don't think that they add anything helpful/informative to this article. I think there are venues online in which this content can be shared, but I don't think a Wikipedia article about Metropolitan Library is the best one for this information. I look forward to hearing your feedback. Tspindle (talk) 14:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Tspindle. I reverted your edit because there was no reason given for the deletion of these rather controversial issues. I think that it is important that controversies such as this are not airbrushed out of Wikipedia. However reading it carefully I would agree that it adds nothing to the article and would be better confined to the entries of the individuals concerned, something I will leave to someone else as I have no ax to grind here. I will unrevert; the fact that the controversy existed remains but it probably could do with copy editing to be more concise. This discussion should probably also be copied to the article talk page. Appreciate your bringing it here rather than just reverting again.Orenburg1 (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Metropolitan Library System (Oklahoma). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]