Talk:Metropolitan Borough of Dudley

Fair use rationale for Image:Arms-dudley-mbc.jpg

Image:Arms-dudley-mbc.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Former counties

This article states that the metropolitan borough of Dudley "is made up of the towns of Dudley (where the council has its headquarters), Stourbridge (again, another council administration hq), Halesowen, Brierley Hill, Amblecote, Sedgley and Coseley." It goes on to say that "The area is historically part of the counties of Worcestershire and Staffordshire." On the other hand, the article on Halesowen states that "Halesowen was traditionally an isolated and separate part of the County of Shropshire...." The article on Shropshire has a simlar statement.

In that case, wouldn't the correct statement be that "The area is historically part of the counties of Worcestershire, Staffordshire, and Shropshire"? I have no direct knowledge of this other than what I read in the three articles, so I have not made a correction. Jim (talk) 19:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim. I have put a little end note into the article's sentence , excluding Halesowen, a detached part of Shropshire before 1844. Like every detached part, Halesowen became part of its surrounding county under the Counties (Detached Parts) Act 1844. Apart from some manorial rights and ecclesiastical rights on churchyards etc., the former county became completely redundant. The changes were largely forgotton by the vast majority, several generations on: making administration simpler and never having created any real bonds with the old host county. Adam37 (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metropolitan Borough of Dudley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120626162024/http://www.westfield.com/corporate/property-portfolio/united-kingdom/merryhill.html to http://www.westfield.com/corporate/property-portfolio/united-kingdom/merryhill.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Metropolitan Borough of Dudley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]