Talk:Metre Convention

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 20, 2013, May 20, 2015, May 20, 2017, May 20, 2019, and May 20, 2022.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

International relations: Law Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Background

The first sentence currently reads "In England in 1215, clause 25 of the Magna Carta set out the standards of measure that were to be applied throughout the realm prefixed."

What is the meaning/purpose of "prefixed" at the end? I don't understand. -- SGBailey (talk) 08:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My guess would be that "throughout the realm prefixed" means "throughout the realm previously defined". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F2C0:A000:A2:0:0:0:42 (talk) 20:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metre Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140703100329/http://www.bipm.org/en/convention/member_states/join_associate.html to http://www.bipm.org/en/convention/member_states/join_associate.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Metre Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

member states

I would be interested in a list of member states that no longer exist. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Taipei

I added a link to show that this is in fact the name used by Taiwan/ROC as an associate member. It makes sense that the link goes to Taiwan, but to help the article, it might be better if it went to Chinese Taipei. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

British Parliamentary Standard of 1758?

I have tagged as dubious a statement in the Background section that sometime??? after 1730, the US Congress adopted the "British Parliamentary Standard of 1758". The article Weights and Measures Acts (UK) lists all such statute measures and there was no such Act of 1758. ~~Should it read 1706?~~

5 & 6 Anne c. 27. (1706)^[1]
An Act for continuing several Subsidies, Impositions and Duties and for making Provisions therein mentioned to raise Money by Way of Loan for the Service of the War, and other Her Majesty's necessary and important Occasions, and for ascertaining the Wine Measure.

"...any Vessel containing two hundred thirty one cubical Inches and no more shall be deemed and taken to be a lawful Wine Gallon..."

This statute is the origin of the US gallon, also known as the Queen Anne Gallon, Queen Anne Wine Gallon, or pre-1824 British gallon.

— Weights and Measures Acts (UK)#18th century

I scanned Statutes at Large, 1789-1875 from 1/1/1830 to 1/1/1834 without finding anything. Suggestions? --Red King (talk) 17:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Red King: I think the "British Parliamentary Standard of 1758" probably refers to the physical yard primary standard of 1758, rather than to an act. A quick search around reveals that Yard#Physical standards and English units#History allude to such a thing being made then. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DeFacto:, that would make more sense. I was being too literal. (In addition, as I realised afterwards, the text refers to distance so the Queen Anne gallon would be irrelevant). The best one is Yard#Physical standards, which says In 1758 the legislature required the construction of a standard yard,^{[citation needed]} which was made from the Royal Society's standard and was deposited with the clerk of the House of Commons; it was divided into feet, one of the feet into inches, and one of the inches into tenths.~~but the citation is not contemporaneous and maybe not too sound.~~ ~~Has anyone scanned Hansard that far back?~~ --Red King (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Ref to Hansard deleted because a citation is given at the Yard article. --Red King (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC) Criticism of the Penny Magazine deleted as invalid (it is actually rather good). I was typecasting it as Penny dreadful, I suppose! --Red King (talk) 16:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Raithby (1811), p. 607.

Sudan? Cuba?

According to BIPM website BIPM-website: About Us → List of Associate States and Economies Cuba an Sudan are not or no longer associate members. — Wassermaus (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Raithby (1811), p. 607.

[1]