Talk:Metasequoia (software)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Superfluous Information
[edit]Do we really need three different, completely uncited sources about its popularity among mods? I tried to make it more neutral when I did my revisions, but considering the absolute lack of sources that are out there, I wasn't able to do much. A long list of all its import and export functions is also unnecessary - and since there was no citing at all there, I removed it.
Tagged for more citations needed. I went looking for some but didn't have any luck finding ones that meet Wikipedia's standards.
Length
[edit]Well since this is only a 50 word article, why did the "tag junky" not bother to "rewrite this article from a neutral point of view per Wikipedia policy" himself?
- I added some meat to this article. Hopefully, it can stand on it's own now. Benway (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- Stub-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Low-importance Free and open-source software articles
- Stub-Class Free and open-source software articles of Low-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles