Talk:Metals of antiquity

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Metals of antiquity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elements Low‑importance

	Chemistry portal This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mining Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arsenic and zinc

Technically, arsenic is not a metal, but a metalloid, or semi-metal. I think Zinc (which was also discovered in the 13th century) would be the first metal isolated. Jokem (talk) 23:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source for metallic zinc so early? Although brass was well-known quite early on, this was calamine brass, formed by cementation from copper and zinc ore. Zinc, as it sublimes and also burns so easily, couldn't easily be isolated and captured in a solid metallic form. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brass is an alloy of copper and zinc, and it seems that it was in wide use from the first millennium BC, including in coinage (see Brass#History). Zinc may not have been isolated separately until later, but it's clear that in the form of brass it was indeed in use very much earlier than this article suggests, and it certainly needs a mention. Richard New Forest (talk) 10:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A 4th century BC vase from Taxila was made of brass containing 34% Zn, more than anything cementation can provide. According to A. K. Biswas, this is strong evidence that metallic Zn was known in India by this time. Double sharp (talk) 16:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metals of antiquity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070108015008/http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/cramb/Processing/history.html to http://neon.mems.cmu.edu/cramb/Processing/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metals of antiquity in the bible

It is interesting to note that all six solid metals (that is, solid at room temperature) are mentioned in the same sentence in the bible, Numbers 31:22. (The context is the purification of pots and pans etc. taken from the spoils of war, so obviously mercury is irrelevant here). 5.144.48.81 (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Section's name

Hey @Remsense, just saw that you reverted the edit I made to the section on astrology/alchemy and the metals.

I had been trying to find an appropriate article link for a section in Classical_planet#Alchemy that was directing to a slightly off-topic article section (check the article's history to see what I mean). It took me a while to find the section in this article because its title isn't descriptive. I don't think it has to be exactly what I changed it to, but I do think it should be more descriptive, otherwise I expect other people will have the same difficulty that I had.

Was there a particular issue that you had with the section title? FropFrop (talk) 09:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]