This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
I've changed the embedded external links into a reference list. Just some comments on some of the references: Alternatives should be found for those statements currently supported by blogspots and forums. These are not reliable sources. If there is no alternative, those statements shouldn't be printed.
Also, is there any significant coverage beyond the article from dawn.com? Multiple coverage is preferable to satisfy WP:Notability guidelines. Marasmusine (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
