Talk:Mercedes F1 W06 Hybrid/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: F1foreverF1 (talk · contribs) 03:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Images: Pass - Suitable licensing for all images. Images in this article are from various sources.

Perhaps the section on Design and development has one or two images.

Stable: Pass - very few edits in recent history.

Neutral: Pass - no dubious opinions evident.

Broad coverage: Pass - covers most things I would expect to see.

It was worth providing Competitiveness and performance context to see how the car compared to its competitors.
Season summary section was well elaborated with sources cited.

Factually accurate and verifiable: Pass - Appears thoroughly referenced to high quality sources

Content matches with the high quality sources.

Well-written: On hold Basically fine.

Design and development could elaborated further to improve the article.

Overall: Pass Nothing major, but some minor tweaks.

@F1foreverF1: Please read my comment on the articles talk page. This article is far from being GA, especially concerning the "Broad coverage" criterium. I would strongly recommend not to pass this review (which you do not appear to have done yet even though you wrote "pass" here). Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I was advised to do, I'll be bold and close this review. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]