Talk:Memento dollar/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Arconning (talk) 15:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 04:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 01:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this in a few days! Arconning (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

denominations of the coin was also produced,, I'm guessing it should be "were"
- Fixed. - G

Background

No issues.

Design and production

No issues.

Later production

the reëmergence, I think this explains itself hehe
- This is correct according to some style guides, and MoS says nothing for or against it. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Generalissima Oh I thought this was a grammar issue, thanks for the new info! Arconning (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Media

All five media have proper licenses and are used appropriately in the article.

Refs

I can't really access the first source so AGF. The following three sources are suitable. :)
Earwig picks up nothing. Manual check is alright as well.

Misc.

No ongoing edit war, broad and focused info, neutral.

Comments

@Generalissima: Here are my short comments! Hope they can be addressed. :) Arconning (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Arconning: Okie dokie, responded! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.