Jump to content

Talk:Memcached

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pronunciation

[edit]

Does anyone really pronounce it "mem-cash-dee?" There isn't a source on that, and I've only ever heard "mem-cashed". Mephistopheles (talk) 13:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WordPress.com also uses memcache, but I did not add it because I disagree with having a list of well known sites in the article like that. It distracts from the article. Foolswisdom 00:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Memcached users? Who cares

[edit]

Who cares who uses Memcached? Clearly Livejournal is significant to the history of Memcached because that is the purpose for which it was created. Lisa 07:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC).exactly...[reply]

Facebook

[edit]

Facebook isn't listed on the referenced link. Is there another source that can verify Facebook is using memcached? ibjhb 16:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was confirmed by a Facebook developer, who suggested they may be the largest installation of the software [1] Sycarr 17:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Facebook definitely uses memcached. In fact, they have largely taken over development of the application and have dramatically improved performance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmalone (talk • contribs) 20:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Zuckerberg on memcached http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=631826881803 129.16.45.135 (talk) 10:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What language?

[edit]

What language is the example code in? Would be helpful to me. I'm guessing Perl, but not sure. This is the first page I've ever read about memcache on (just heard about it on a podcast). I found the list of sites that use it to be helpful in understanding the popularity, and lets me know that it must be a fairly stable platform. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.5.116 (talk) 03:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PHP. 70.36.146.102 (talk) 06:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

example with race condition

[edit]

The update part of the example contains a race, for some time the data in the DB and the memcache differ. In case of a crash of the client, this might be arbitrarily long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.155.122 (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How much of a performance boost does Memcached provide?

[edit]

For instance, how much does it reduce the load of Wikipedia's servers? Does it cut it in half, or in a third, or what? Tisane (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should a small note about this be included in wikipedia entry?

[edit]

I mean this: http://www.sensepost.com/blog/4873.html Anyone read it already? What say? Will it be worth putting a note under Security (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Memcached#Security)? JainAmber (talk) 10:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bullet Cache previously know as mdcached

[edit]

I think Bullet Cache a new alternative to Memcached should be added to the "Also see" section. Here is some info.

Maximum entry size

[edit]

While memcached does recommend a maximum entry size of 1 MB, you can change this setting to allow entries of size up to 128 MB, albeit with performance degradation. I propose removing the line mentioning the maximum entry size entirely. BlackVegetable (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Memcached. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Memcached. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Memcached&oldid=1203968609"