Talk:Membrane paradigm

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Keeping it real

The entire "what is reality" section seems like speculation, and doesn't belong here. Ken Arromdee 07:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So I've deleted it. At least until someone can come up with a source which says "The use of this argument to support general relativity is problematic.". Ken Arromdee 19:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong article

This article is not about membrane paradigm, but about holographic principle (a completely different thing).--213.141.159.52 07:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was suprised to see them linked together. --Michael C. Price ^talk 13:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless anyone objects I shall delete the holographic principle related stuff here. --Michael C. Price ^talk 09:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetic field lines

Be nice to see a mention of the above as well. Are they locked onto the membrane, for example. And what relevance has this for quasars? --Michael C. Price ^talk 13:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Different Credit?

Kip Thorne himself credits Hanni and Ruffini for the membrane paradigm. Why the disagreement? Jlodman (talk) 02:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]