This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Seeing as Jean of Arsuf married, and then died around 1177, when Melisande was a child, it's probable that he was her older half-brother. Melisande was born after 1170 as her youngest son Guy was born around 1215, making it impossible for Melisande to have been born earlier than that date. She inherited the title from her brother in 1177 and had two younger sisters, so one can conclude that she was born between 1171 and 1175. Her father had to have died before 1177, seeing as his son Jean attained the title of Lord of Arsuf.--jeanne (talk) 10:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually Melisande's father Guy was never Lord of Arsuf. Her brother Jean was the first to hold the title. She inherited it from him.--jeanne (talk) 08:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Arsuf and Arsur are both the name of the fief. The crusaders themselves tended to spell it with an R at the end for whatever reason, but not always, and modern historians use both forms according to taste. (A search of Google Books for "John of Arsur" and "John of Arsuf", minus results from Wikipedia, shows both forms are common). Adam Bishop (talk) 11:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
