Talk:Melampitta

Articles to include

• Homobatrachotoxin in the Genus Pitohui: Chemical Defense in Birds?
• DUMBACHER, J; DEINER, K; THOMPSON, L; FLEISCHER, R (December 2008). "Phylogeny of the avian genus Pitohui and the evolution of toxicity in birds" (PDF). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 49 (3): 774–781. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.09.018.
• Rajchard, Josef (January 2009). "The batrachotoxins with a protective function in birds". Ethology Ecology & Evolution. 21 (1): 79–82. doi:10.1080/08927014.2009.9522512.
• Lee Goff, M. (27 January 1983). "Studies on Papua New Guinea Chiggers (Acari: Trombiculidae) X. Two new species of Schoengastiini". Journal of Medical Entomology. 20 (1): 40–43. doi:10.1093/jmedent/20.1.40.
• Price, Roger D.; Hellenthal, Ronald A. (April 2005). "A New Genus and New Species of Chewing Louse (Phthiraptera: Menoponidae) from the Lesser Melampitta (Aves: Passeriformes)". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 78 (2): 167–171. doi:10.2317/0406.01.1.
• Aggerbeck, Marie; Fjeldså, Jon; Christidis, Les; Fabre, Pierre-Henri; Jønsson, Knud Andreas (January 2014). "Resolving deep lineage divergences in core corvoid passerine birds supports a proto-Papuan island origin". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 70: 272–285. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.09.027.
• Diamond, JM (1985). "New Distributional Records and Taxa from the Outlying Mountain Ranges of New Guinea". Emu. 85 (2): 65. doi:10.1071/MU9850065.
• Clark, George A. (1975). "Additional Records of Passerine Terrestrial Gaits" (PDF). The Wilson Bulletin. 87 (3): 384–389.
• Barker, F. K.; Cibois, A.; Schikler, P.; Feinstein, J.; Cracraft, J. (19 July 2004). "Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (30): 11040–11045. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401892101.
• Norman, Janette A.; Ericson, Per G.P.; Jønsson, Knud A.; Fjeldså, Jon; Christidis, Les (August 2009). "A multi-gene phylogeny reveals novel relationships for aberrant genera of Australo-Papuan core Corvoidea and polyphyly of the Pachycephalidae and Psophodidae (Aves: Passeriformes)". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 52 (2): 488–497. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.03.019.
• FJELDSÅ, Jon (29 June 2013). "The global diversification of songbirds (Oscines) and the build-up of the Sino-Himalayan diversity hotspot". Chinese Birds. 4 (2): 132–143. doi:10.5122/cbirds.2013.0014.

• Rather a poorly researched family but some stuff here! Sabine's Sunbird talk 20:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Melampitta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

I'll take this - notes below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

being considered at one time related to the pittas, Old World babblers and birds-of-paradise. - they weren't considered related to all three at once...? So reword/ add "variously" or something?

• Fixed. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

it's not "melam", but rather melas "black", or stem is melano- - from p. 431 of my Liddell & Scott Ancient Greek Dictionary, meaning "dark, gloomy, dusky, black"

• Fixed. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

could link "taxonomic dustbin" to Wastebasket taxon

• Fixed. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Both species have a discontinuous distribution across New Guinea, and the greater melampitta is generally a rare bird that is seldom encountered, although this may because it lives in seldom visited areas - recommend changing one "seldom" and hyphen after the second one.

• Fixed. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

"disconfirmed" ? - could find a plainer word than this I suspect.

• I went with refuted. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

link terrestrial

• Done. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Otherwise looking pretty "Good"....

• Al done now, thanks Cas. Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: - nice read Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)