Talk:Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People

For future reference

Mejlis calls on Crimean Tatars to vote for Tymoshenko — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 19:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is that "illogical"???

“

The Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People is the central executive body of the National Congress of Crimean Tatars who live in their homeland of Crimea, Ukraine or are the citizens thereof.

”

Mejlis is the executive of National Congress that consist of Crimean Tatar nationals who live in their homeland of Crimea, Ukraine or are citizens thereof. What is illogical? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The second sentence is OK. The first sentence becomes illogical whe you put squar brackets: National Congress of Crimean Tatars who live in their homeland of Crimea: I.e it reads as if the Congress lives in their homeland. In addition the "National Congress" is calld Qurultay, just as Russian Parliament is called Duma or lithuanian one is called Seimas. -No.Altenmann >t 14:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your next edit coinfirms your confusion: "(All members of Mejlis are citizens of Ukraine)" While I agree my version was faulty, because my 'thereof' referred to the previous country, Ukraine (here is no country 'crimea' from whatever political POV), but Qurultay (not mejlis, btw) is for tatars who are residents or citizens, i.e. it is not for Cr tatars of turkish citizenship. -No.Altenmann >t 14:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Re [1]. These are very POV edits, unsupported by sources, and has no consensus. Please stop trying to cram it in.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is their latest edit, and I can see two problems with this. First, this is sourcing of a highly contentious claim to YouTube. This might be fine if sourced to something better. Second, why a personal opinion (and a highly questionable one) by a non-notable journalist should be included here? No, it should not. My very best wishes (talk) 13:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(latest edits by red-linked account) - Many RS do call it "occupation" [2]. What exactly wording should be used may depend on the context. My very best wishes (talk) 12:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be included in the article.....

.... that the Mejlis supported Petro Poroshenko at the 2019 Ukrainian presidential election of 31 March 2019? (Source: here (in Ukrainian).) — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 13:13, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This seems relevant/useful info so I included it! Jjazz76 (talk) 19:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Пидарюги, о чем вы тут пиздите. Крым был Русским так и останется таким. 31.181.100.118 (talk) 14:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incoherent

This article is almost impossible to make sense of. Is there a Wikipedia quality policy? 142.181.188.183 (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any incoherence. Improvements are needed, especially in sourcing. But the article is coherent. Boud (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]