Talk:Megan Andelloux

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Rhode Island Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Low-importance).

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relevance of Miko Exoticwear?

There seems to be a back-and-forth over the inclusion of the Miko store in the description of the Sexuality Learning and Resource Center. First, I'll note that this information can be sourced [1]. However, I'm not sure what the relevance to the article is, and frankly, it seems clumsily dropped in for the sole purpose of being insinuatory. On the other hand, if the Sexuality Learning and Resource Center was part of Miko's business, and not just housed there, it would probably be OK to include this info. It should probably be phrased differently, though. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 03:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm looking at earlier edits and I see where the conflict comes from. Quite honestly, it looks like a bit of tit-for-tat on the part of User:EconProfessor. Basically, 'if you put things I don't like in the Donna M. Hughes article, I'll add stuff about Andelloux's "Fabulous Fellatio" classes in her article'. I would hope the additions to each article would be covered on their own merits. This kind of "tit for tat" approach is uncalled for and uncivil. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 03:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found more information about Miko's business. According to this article, the store "offers workshops and classes for women and couples, both gay and straight." However, it refers to them as part of the "Miko Learning and Resource Center," which seems to be the same thing as the "Sexuality Learning and Resource Center" sourced in other articles (like [2]). Note the dates on the articles; it's possible the name was simply changed at some point between the two. I don't know if this offers any insight on whether or not the fact that Megan Andelloux's workshops were "housed in the Miko store" should be included in the article, as it seems the "Learning and Resource Center" is consistently distinguished from the storefront, but it may provide a reference in the event that other Wikipedians decide it should be included. I'll note, also, that it's not an uncommon practice for sex toy retailers to provide sex education workshops staffed with sex educators, sometimes as part of their business model, other times as a charitable contribution to the community in which they reside, and often both. As such, I'm also unsure it's something the "general reader might want to consult as a reference." --Meitar (talk) 20:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure of interest

My name is Meitar Moscovitz; I go by the handle "maymay" as well. I created this article some months ago after I began researching Megan Andelloux's history. She and I have both been the subject of articles published by Donna M. Hughes and Margaret Brooks (see Talk:Donna M. Hughes). After noticing the continuing edit conflicts on Megan Andelloux's article as well as Ms. Hughes' article, I'm here in order to offer as much knowledgeable information as I can to support WP:NPOV.

I'm very aware of Wikipedia's policies, and intend to strictly abide by them. I'll note I've been exercising extreme restraint with regards to the edits made by User:EconProfessor, since they strike me as disingenuous. I also think User:EconProfessor has a conflict of interest as I suspect they're either Margaret Brooks or a some other close political ally of Ms. Hughes (see this notice). In either event, my edits to Donna M. Hughes's page have been restricted to typo fixes and will remain as non-controversial as that unless I have more to offer, which I'll indicate on the appropriate article's Talk page before asking for help from other Wikipedians.

I'm disclosing my interest in these articles as I'd now like to offer additional source material for both of them. My first additional reference, however, is from Ms. Andelloux's own writing and relates to her article, so I'm going to add it here in a moment. I'll include additional references or other contributions as I encounter more sources. Please let me know if there are any more ways I can be helpful. --Meitar (talk) 04:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Megan Andelloux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://phinli.com/Talent/Profile/megan-andelloux

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Megan Andelloux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Megan Andelloux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]