Talk:Medullary breast carcinoma

Medicine: Hematology-oncology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.

Women's Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2021 and 20 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Abnormalsaline. Peer reviewers: CheckDO.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation

Lead Section: Topic of article stated, though not concise/direct
Summary: Summarizes all major points in the article
Context: All information included is also present in body of the article

Organization: No sections
Context: Covers some of the assigned topic area
Balance: Article presents balanced coverage without favoring one side unduly
Tone: Tone is neutral and appropriate for an encyclopedia audience
Images: Images are relevant. Article is more visually attractive

Citations: Very few or no sources
Sources: Most sources are the best available, are appropriate for the disciple/genre
Completeness: Most references include completely filled-out citation template or are otherwise complete

New sections: Sections added do not cover the topic adequately
Re-organization: Article organization is improved, but retains flaws
Gaps: Some gaps are filled
Smaller additions: Content is added in one block, with little regard to article organization
Abnormalsaline (talk) 00:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Workplan

Workplan
Question	Comments
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic?	Yes. Everything is clear and concise.
Is the article neutral?	Yes it is, but there are many gaps of relevant information. This can be improved through the addition of additional sources and the creation of sections.
Is anything missing that could be added?	Although there is a good synopsis of Medullary Breast Carcinoma, more information can be added to enhance learning.
Which sections will you prioritize?	There is currently only one section. The plan is the add additional information to this summary section and then organize and create different sections.
Will you also embed additional links to other Wiki pages?	Yes. There should be cross over between different Wiki pages.

Abnormalsaline (talk) 00:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Evaluation: Medullary Breast Carcinoma

Lead section: Topic of article stated, though not concise/direct. Lead sentence could use more information about the pathology and does not need to include information about treatment; save that for later. "DCIS" acronym is used and never defined.

Summary: Summarizes most major points, but misses one or more important aspects. Would like to see prognosis included. Could be organized more clearly.

Context: All information included is also present in body of the article

Other: The lead section should not include a histology slide.

Article

Organization: Great improvements in adding Tumor staging, Ridolfi Criteria, and the other subheadings and sections. Filling in the infobox would greatly enhance the aesthetic appeal of this page. Consider moving the table on "various types of cancer" back to external links section. This was a rather confusing table for such a short article. Most of the cancers described were not breast cancers.

Context: Covers info relevant to assigned topic; links to relevant articles all intact for background

Balance: Article presents balanced coverage without favoring one side unduly

Tone: Tone is neutral and appropriate for an encyclopedia audience

Images: Histopathology slide is relevant and well written. It should be moved out of lead section.

References

Citations: A few statements at the end of some paragraphs have unclear sourcing. Focus efforts on statements marked with "citation needed"

Sources: The sources are credible, but there are relatively few for a topic of such depth. May consider using e-books such as Robbins Pathology and other credible academic resources that speak to the topic

Completeness: Most references include completely filled-out citation template or are otherwise complete

You've made many additions to provide more meat to this article. Focus efforts on organizational changes that will be aesthetically appealing, simplify reader's interpretation, or summarize material more succinctly (eg - bullet points if lists are being generated) and supporting each statement with research. CheckDO (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]