Talk:Medidata Solutions

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Bernie44 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Medidata Solutions on their behalf.

advert template

I don't think the advert template is relevant any more with all the legal problems listed on the page now. Some of the language could still be improved, but the page as a whole seems much more balanced than two years ago when the template was added. Zaurus (talk) 16:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I no longer have a COI, but I think my original points stands. The article can definitely be improved, but it is now far from sounding like an advert. --Zaurus (talk) 05:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stevie Awards listed

Because of my COI I don't want to restore, but I have asked more details about the deletion of the Stevie Awards Recognition on User_talk:SwisterTwister#Medidata_Solutions_WP:NOT, but I haven't gotten a reply yet. --Zaurus (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medidata Solutions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150317192318/http://www.pharmatimes.com/article/11-06-21/Medidata_taps_into_%E2%80%9Cnew_better%E2%80%9D_CTMS_with_Clinical_Force_acquisition.aspx to http://www.pharmatimes.com/article/11-06-21/Medidata_taps_into_%E2%80%9Cnew_better%E2%80%9D_CTMS_with_Clinical_Force_acquisition.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]