Jump to content

Talk:Media coverage of the Syrian civil war

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rename it

[edit]

Syrian state media coverage of the 2011 Syrian uprising (because all the sources were of SANA) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.249.146.210 (talk) 17:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

News article

[edit]

This news article could be used to expand the article: [1]--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 18:57, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is of very poor quality, either it is deleted, or we use some actual sources, not just Youtube links. FunkMonk (talk) 06:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burnt car 17 April 2011 Banias Syria.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Burnt car 17 April 2011 Banias Syria.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Syria Daraa 17 april 2011 - 01.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Syria Daraa 17 april 2011 - 01.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Syria Damascus Douma Protests 2011 - 30.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Syria Damascus Douma Protests 2011 - 30.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:21, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing unsourced BLP claims

[edit]

I've removed the material regarding the Gay Girl in Damascus hoax as it is largely irrelavnt to the discussion and does not appear to have been state-sponsored agitprop (outside fringe nutters on the interwebs). Keeping it here seems only to serve as a means of expressing personal vendetta agst cis/het males from western activists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.143.244 (talk) 18:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda section

[edit]

The first sentence of the propaganda section of the article reads "Propaganda has been used by both the Syrian government[18] and the west since the beginning of the conflict." That section _should_ focus solely on state propaganda (whether by the Syrian Arab Republic or states committed to its destruction) rather than on vague attributions to other actors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.143.244 (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why? XavierItzm (talk) 08:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Given the 'secret prison' -that no one is able to find - and the dodgy CNN video report of the prisoner 'hiding under the blanket', is it not clear that both state and cheer-leaders for the rebels are able to put out any old BS? 2.30.22.205 (talk) 13:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC):[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Media coverage of the Syrian Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media coverage of the Syrian Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CE

[edit]

Tidies prose and simplified headers, I fear for the standing of an article that leans so heavily on CNN, The Guardian and COMbbc. Where are the countervailing articles from RT etc? Keith-264 (talk) 15:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Off topic

[edit]

Stop resinseting this paragraph without using the talk page:

The United States' National Public Radio reported in November 2016 that in Damascus "Many here seem to be carrying on with grace and dignity, even enjoying mundane, simple pleasures."[1]

This has nothing to do with the subject of the paragraph (media propaganda) and is hence WP:OFFTOPIC. LucLeTruc (talk) 12:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Will re-insert as just reporting on everyday life. No worries, mate. XavierItzm (talk) 10:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Which does not make the entry worthy of inclusion. Imho it totally lacks context and gives no useful information at all. But at least now it contains no WP:OR or WP:POV anymore. LucLeTruc (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have added it back. It seems to me that a section that includes the sentence that the Syrian government "accusing the U.S. of propaganda" merits WP:BALANCE. I should add that a one-person complaint against well-sourced material from WP:RS does not give than person a veto right. XavierItzm (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Alison Meuse (1 November 2016). "The Damascus Paradox: Everyday Life In A Country Torn By War". NPR National Public Radio. Retrieved 5 November 2016. Many here seem to be carrying on with grace and dignity, even enjoying mundane, simple pleasures — like the teenage girls and a 40-something man snapping selfies in front of a giant "I (Heart) Damascus" sculpture in a main square.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Media coverage of the Syrian Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment at Talk:White Helmets

[edit]

Hello, there is a RfC at the White Helmets Talk page which you're invited to participate in. -GPRamirez5 (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC) GPRamirez5 (talk) 14:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]