Jump to content

Talk:Meander (art)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 17 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GroundedDuckling.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

[edit]

The article presents both a personal political bias and error in the following statement: "The symbol of the meander is considered to be a greek trademark, although it was altered and used by nationalists of Europe, degrading by this way its original meaning and value".

The meander, first of all, is only used by Greek nationalists -- and not, as the article alleges, by a number of various European nationalists. Secondly, aside from its use as an ornamental pattern in art and architecture, its only significance and value is as a symbol of Greek nationalism; there is no other "original meaning and value" outside of that. Finally, to state that its use by nationalists constitutes a degradation implies that nationalists and nationalism are debased which is clearly a personal socio-political bias of the author, not to mention quite offensive. Critias 21:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As two months have passed and no action has been taken to remove the aforementioned bias to give the article a neutral point of view, I have taken it upon myself to make the relevant changes. Critias 04:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics

[edit]

The ASCII examples of meander shapes are broken in 800x600 resolution, in case it matters. --Kaffedrake 15:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Broken for me, too. Ashibaka tock 20:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to move the section to this talk page because it was broken on my browser as well, but since there have been others who have comment on the same thing and nothing has been done about it, I'll just leave it cut out. If anybody wants to take a stab at fixing it, here's the link to the last revision that had it before I nuked it: [1]. Hidden Glass 07:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research

[edit]

No page is better than a page without references. Any suggestions for sources for a rewrite? I would be willing to contribute. Saji Loupgarou (talk) 14:58, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Think it needs some deletions - to leave only most famous/usual/different variants. ·Carn·!? 20:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]