Talk:Meßkirch

Anglicized Spelling

The title of this article should probably be changed to Messkirch within the English Wikipedia, as the eszett (ß) isn't part of the Latin alphabet. (All too many English readers will think it's a "B".) See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Foreign terms. --RevWaldo 21:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as requested Mike Cline (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meßkirch → Messkirch – This article was originally titled “Messkirch”. It was moved without explanation or discussion a while ago to the current title. As the original title was in standard English spelling, and conformed to guidelines on title and using English, while the current one does not, I am seeking to have this moved back to its original title.
I am doing this via WP:RM as it cannot be carried out conventionally, and requires admin assistance to do so. Moonraker12 (talk) 13:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I get 257 post-1990 English-language Google Book hits for "Messkirch" town, 35 for "Meßkirch" town. Kauffner (talk) 16:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the correct name of the town is Meßkirch! German-language Google Book hits ~5670 (total Google hits ~779000) for Meßkirch Stadt and ~2280 (total Google hits ~527000 for Messkirch Stadt. --KMJagger (talk) 21:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It may be the correct name in German, but it is incorrect in English. So the correct thing to do, according to any number of guidelines here, is put the title correctly in English, with the name in German format in the opening sentence (something like "Messkirch (German orthography Meßkirch) is...") Moonraker12 (talk) 11:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support WP:BRD per nom, WP:Use English per Kauffner. 70.24.247.54 (talk) 06:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. WP:UCN, WP:UE, etc. It's English-language sources that are relevant, not German ones, and the English ones predominantly use "ss". Jenks24 (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Meßkirch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071204122026/http://www.traebbe.de/ to http://www.traebbe.de/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]