Talk:Mckenna Grace/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk (talk · contribs) 12:13, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your reviews on Oliver and LWT lists- happy to review this! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:13, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Pamzeis, done with the review. Just a few small things to clean up and it's ready for GA! Nice job! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 13:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- My true intention behind reviewing your lists was to make you my slave and feel obligated to review everything I nominated![just kidding] But anyways, I've responded to your comments below. Let me know if you have any other issues! Pamzeis (talk) 02:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- I shall take the role of Court Reviewer of the High Castle of Pamzeis with great honor! But, don't worry, I'm a strong believer in quid pro quo. Thanks for addressing the concerns- good for GA! Nice work! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 11:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is clear and free of typos. |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Complies with MoS standards for layout and fiction- lead is well-written. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Refs are placed in a proper "References" section. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Most sources are to entertainment websites or magazines, and some are to review sites (e.g. Rotten Tomatoes) and music streaming services (Apple Music). All reliable in their usage. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | Spotchecking the following, chosen at random:
All come up clear, no OR visible. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig shows no violations. High scores on some sources are due to names and quotes. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Addresses her early life, acting career, music career, influences, and personal life. All good here. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article stays focused throughout. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No editorial bias visible. |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | There have been a number of revisions in the last month that were reverted due to lack of sources, which is justified but I felt was worth noting. The reversions went unchallenged- no edit warring present. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Images are properly CC tagged. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Grace cites American singers Lana Del Rey and Taylor Swift (right) as her main influences.- (left) needs to be placed after Lana Del Ray, otherwise it's inconsistent.
Images are relevant and properly captioned. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.