Talk:McKinley Tariff

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hawaii Mid‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Hawaii

I removed this text:

It basically deleted the treaty of 1875 with Hawaii.

Because there is no sign of an 1875 treaty with Hawaii. It is not on this List of United States treaties and it is not mentioned in the histories of Hawaii. Please provide more information. -Will Beback 22:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The claim concerns the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875. —Viriditas | Talk 01:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The United States had a commercial reciprocity agreement with Hawaii in 1875, this is probably the treaty to which the aforementioned quote is referring. The tariff made it more difficult for the white planters on Hawaii to sell the sugar they were growing, though it didn't "delete the treaty." It did however lead to a greater push from said white planters for the annexation of Hawaii to the United States as a way to get around the tariff. I've taken this from my history textbook, The American Pageant, Twelfth Edition. Xydane 02:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Xydane[reply]

The article states that the tariff "protected agriculture," but then it says "The tariff was detrimental to the American farmers." Don't those statements contradict each other? note: this doesn't belong under the Hawaii heading but I didn't want to screw anything up by trying to make a new heading. 24.186.43.182 03:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Steven[reply]

This needes to be edited

This is completley biased.

The McKinley Tariff also had some beneficial points, because it was a protective tariff. I'd revise it.

Conventional economic wisdom is that any tariff benefits import-competing industries at the expense of exporting industries, and results in lower overall welfare. It seems that the McKinley Tariff is no exception. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.20.255.5 (talk) 03:08, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BIASED

McKinley's behaviour was unscientific and doomed to failure.

That sounds like fair and balanced research....revise it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.231.152.82 (talk) 22:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The crystal ball says

"The McKinley Tariff was replaced with the Wilson-Gorman Tariff in 1894, which promptly lowered tariff rates.[2]"

The reference points to

^ Taussig, F.W. The Tariff History of the United States. 8th ed. New York, NY: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1892. 291. Print

The cited text was published 2 years before the event cited? Wow. Oh, wait, also published in 1931. Also 1910. Such.... clarity. 24.28.17.231 (talk) 19:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:McKinley Tariff/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class==

Stub class because one section and not much developed.EECavazos 22:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==WP Tax Priority==

Low priority because past law, not much given on any present impact.EECavazos 22:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 23:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)