Talk:McDonnell F3H Demon

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Not comperable to F100

Need a more appropriate comparison - this was only transonic while the century series were all supersonic in level flight. - Leonard G. 15:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Wacky Wiki Facts

This article states: "The supersonic USAF F-101 Voodoo also retained much of the Demon's layout." Really? The F-101 was derived from the XF-88 (which truly looks like an anemic one-oh-wonder, something the Demon doesn't much even resemble) which first flew in 1948 (development beginning in 1946). Since development work on the Demon didn't begin until 1949 according to this fine article, it would have been a neat trick for the Voodoo to retain much of the layout of a design concept that succeded it. Sounds like original research, i.e., being polite for someone whose head is where the sun don't shine, to this long suffering Wiki reader. However, it is in keeping with the general scholarship one finds on Wiki (where it seems every aviation article is written or commandeered by folks who have little knowledge or understanding of American aviation) as well as a penchant for using spellings like programme, etc. if you get my drift. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.141 (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Is there a need for the citation bombing tags on this article? Was there an issue with unsourced or unreferenced material? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on McDonnell F3H Demon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]