Jump to content

Talk:McDonald's Cycle Center/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Just one issue with prose that will not preclude the article from passing:
  • Details "Awnings produce shade for the interior." This seems to be stated a little matter-of-factly. If something can be explained about how the awnings work or why they were needed this would help.
  1. B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Very well done and informative article. No vital improvements necessary at the time of review. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]