This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
Inline cite tags and too long tags are being restored. This article is entirely too long in accordance with similar articles and wiki standards. Wiki articles should provide universal context to the unlearned reader. This article is very cumbersome, burdensome and entirely too long to encourage an unlearned reader. Although inline cites have been added there are large blocks of texts and entire sections that have no citations. All factual claims within the article should have citations. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For future reference, much article cleanup and unref removal was done thanks to @Nyttend:, @Rui Gabriel Correia: and perhaps others. It seems User:Ndandulalibingi (now blocked) added problematic/COI sources. Editors may want to be on the lookout for any attempts to re-add COI or unref/non-RS detail here. Dl2000 (talk) 02:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
