Talk:Mazomanie, Wisconsin

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Which image is east and which is west?

Currently, both photos are labeled "Looking east at Mazomanie." Is one of them supposed to be west? Which is which? --Ben Kovitz 20:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both images are labeled properly. I took both of them ,and both are looking east. I live around 4 hours of driving away from the place, so I am only vaguely familiar with the city. I passed through the city one day on vacation. I drove through the city from west towards the east and took 2 images within a single minute of each other according to the metadata. The Mobil sign that is prominent on the second image is barely visible on the first image. If you think that 2 images facing the same direction in the same small city is overload, then remove the #2 image from the article. Royalbroil 20:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology of name Mazomanie

The History section of this article really overdoes it on the etymology of the name Mazomanie. It's long, technical, and convoluted. It would be better, and more interesting reading, if it were pared down to 2-3 sentences. I suspect the section was also plagiarized from some offline source. 70.134.226.3 (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of agree with the above, except for the plagiarism accusation, but bombing the section with 4 tags is not the answer. Just talk here and edit. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 21:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mazomanie, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2 to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]