Talk:Max Velmans

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Max_Velmans (talk · contribs) / Velmans, Max Velmans, Max

Untitled

I tidied up the publication list, and clarified the reference to the foundation of the BPS CEP section (as opposed to the foundation of the BPS). The range of external links to the broader discipline (and the fact that one of Velmans' books has its own WP page) seems to make the notability case. Would anyone care to remove the notability tag? SusanStuart (talk) 23:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since the notability tag was added, no references have been added (only tidied up a bit). There is no reference that is independent (and verifiable). Biographies of living people have a high standard of referencing - see WP:BLP and in particular Wikipedia:Notability_(academics). I suspect he is notable per book, stature, etc, but it needs to be verifiable in the article. Widefox (talk) 15:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that there are quite a few tags on this entry. As I am the subject of the entry it would be improper for me to get too involved in editing it (as the History tab shows, my involvement since its posting in 2006 has been limited to a few minor edits of the original stub). Quite a bit of information is available online though, for example on the Goldsmiths College website. Beyond that, Velmans is a rare name and I am the only Velmans involved in consciousness studies, so quite a lot of information from independent sources can be found by typing the keywords "Velmans" and "consciousness" into Google. There are also many independent book reviews of my main book Understanding Consciousness (mentioned in the stub). See for example the extracts listed on Amazon.co.uk or Amazon.com. I hope this helps anyone looking to improve the entry - but if anyone wants anything more specific from me that might be relevant (e.g. pointers to specific kinds of independent source, or items from my CV) do feel free to email me and I will try to help. M Velmans (talk) 12:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Max, yes feel free to improve the article per WP:COI. In particular, merging may not actually be as good an idea as I thought initially, but references and other opinions will clarify. Regards Widefox (talk) 15:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Widefox

I've added non-primary links wherever I have seen them to be needed. Hopefully that sorts things out. Could add lots more - but will wait for response M Velmans (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Propose: Due to lack of references, article sizes, and overlap of the articles Widefox (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest expanding the Reflexive Monism entry. Its a complex theoretical position and all that exists, at present, is a short summary paragraph - with nothing about how one arrives at that view or about the many consequences of it. My problem of course is that, while I am in the best position to expand this in a way that will be meaningful to readers, I am also the author of this position. Given this, I'm not sure about how best to proceed - or even whether to proceed given the COI. Happy to be advised M Velmans (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The best thing you can do is dig up reliable independent sources and leave them on the talk page for others to integrate in. IRWolfie- (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK IRWolfie, will do M Velmans (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Velmans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723003803/http://www.acss.org.uk/about5.htm to http://www.acss.org.uk/about5.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Velmans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]