Talk:Max Scheler

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Philosophy: Philosophers / Ethics / Religion / Continental / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism High‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs a biblio

This page needs a bibliography. It would be especially helpful to have a list of Scheler's works that have been translated into English.

I'd appreciate if somone would translate the first paragraph of the article into English. Dan 06:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

emotive, not emotional. Jeff Governale (this was emphasized in many class w/Dr. Frings,)

"Max Scheler extended the phenomenological method to include a reduction of the scientific method too, thus questioning the idea of Husserl that phenomenological philosophy should be pursued as a rigorous science. Natural and scientific attitudes (Einstellung) are both phenomenologically counterpositive and hence must be sublated in the advancement of the real phenomenological reduction which, in the eyes of Scheler, has more the shapes of an allround ascesis (Askese) rather than a mere logical procedure of suspending the existential judgments. The Wesenschau, according to Scheler, is an act of blowing up the Sosein limits of Sein A into the essential-ontological domain of Sein B, in short, an ontological participation of Sosenheiten, seeing the things as such (cf. the Buddhist concept of tathata, and the Christian theological quidditas)."

Does this paragraph have any meaning whatsoever? I've read it several times, but can't understand what it is supposed to mean (even for someone who knows Heidegger and German). And whence the jarring insertion of Buddhist Tathagata all of a sudden? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.153.88.235 (talk) 11:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a list of books and I think most, if not all books are public domain now. I found "Die Ursachen Des Deutschenhasses": https://archive.org/details/MaxSchelerDieUrsachenDesDeutschenhasses/mode/2up - Shall that be included?105.0.4.164 (talk) 15:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Scheler_max.jpg 78.92.64.229 (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This guy inspired Social Construction Theory! I'm going to add this section. This is relevant today and he needs credit for this.

Max Scheler's recommendation to T. Adorno was "mehr Dunkel." Darkness (obscurity) is supposed to be a characteristic of deep profundity.173.61.95.154 (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)D'antay Cubbins[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Scheler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20000831210015/http://www.phenomenologycenter.org/gallery2.htm to http://www.phenomenologycenter.org/gallery2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]