Talk:Max Grodénchik

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photos

Anyone have a photo of him without the make-up?

Expert?

This line "He is famous for being an expert on the Rules of Acquisition and can quote them by memory." makes no sense. Every Ferengi knows the rules of acquisition. Every Ferengi learns these rules as a child. It's like saying I'm famous for being an expert in reciting the alphabet...EVERYONE knows the alphabet! Vince 02:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article means that the actor, Max Grodenchik, can recite the rules from memory. Frankg 06:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to mention it, I'm not sure every Ferengi can quote them by heart. I was just watching a marathon and I remember seeing various Ferengi stumble more than once. Quark was complimented by his mother for having memorized them thoroughly and quickly unlike his brother. So if it was about his character, it might not necessarily be true. Either way, some verifiable source could help to determine whether it's true about his character or the actor, firstly, and secondly, whether it's true at all. Maybe someone could find a quote from a DS9 episode or a page that verifies this for the actor? 98.15.211.137 (talk) 04:22, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improving this article...

Max has been the subject of numerous news sources and his life and carer has been coverd in many books. If concerns are so easily surmountable, deletion is not an option. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

birthday

was he born in 1966 or in 1952? both dates are in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.66.37.79 (talk) 12:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I second that, the dates are completely different. He can't be born in two different years. Maybe someone can find a valid source to verify the date? If he's not well-known enough to have a page, maybe the birth date could be removed until a verifiable source for that information can be found. 98.15.211.137 (talk) 04:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC) (tiel)[reply]

Name spelling illegal.

Resolved

His name is spelled "Grodénchik" in this article. The "é" is not an English letter and is not allowed on the English version of Wikipedia. Being from New York, this foreign letter is also illegal under NYS law. It should be removed from the article.Presidentbalut (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please see Talk:René_Auberjonois/Archives/2015#Name spelling illegal.. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article is correct as-is. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]