Talk:Maurice Blackburn (law firm)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hagiography
[edit]At present the article sounds too much like a list of achievements and although referenced is far from the objectivity required for an encyclopaedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.74.246.90 (talk) 06:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Negative content
[edit]I am concerned about the amount of negative content in the article, compared to its overall length. The negative content has a mixture of primary and secondary sources, but to justify such a long negative section, multiple high quality negative sources would be required. PhilKnight (talk) 10:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Worthwhile changing the article image?
[edit]Might make more sense to update the article image to the logo of the law firm rather than an oil painting of the guy who started the firm no?
I'm not super well versed on Creative Commons licences, so i don't want to change it myself. EskyThief (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian law articles
- Low-importance Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles