Talk:Masters of the Ancient Wisdom

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 January 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Using anandgholap.net as a source or link

This site is the personally registered site of Anand Gholap of Pune, India. He has a disclaimer that he is not responsible for the use of anything on his site (http://www.anandgholap.net/Terms_Of_Use.htm). He makes no special claims of expertise or any affiliation. A number of texts and images from books are on his site but copyright status is uncertain as he does not have specific permission to make these public domain but has added these on the basis of his understanding of copyright law which is not the same as Wikipedia's. His site fails WP:RS and WP:ELNO and should not be used as a reference or link for any article apart from (possibly) an article about himself.—Ash (talk) 17:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bias in sources - this article is promotional

A glance at the sources in this article shows a complete bias to publications by organizations devoted to promoting Theosophy. To ignore all the articles which debunk the claims and quotes from people who have been in "telepathic" contact with "Masters" (such as Blavatsky and Creme) appears deliberate bias and makes this Wikipedia article completely non-encyclopaedic.—Ash (talk) 11:58, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article is entirely about Theosophy. Therefore, as a first step, I have moved it to Masters of the Ancient Wisdom (Theosophy). Cardamon (talk) 23:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I must agree, the sourcing is almost purely to Blavatsky herself and/or other sources published by Theosophical Publishing House. Reliable third-party sourcing is badly needed. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 06:43, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What does a Master of Wisdom know...? I do not know, but I know a man who does...